Why the study?
Is local intramural heparin delivery safe and feasible during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction?
Is local intramural heparin delivery safe and feasible during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction?
Local heparin delivery during primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction is a feasible and safe approach that may reduce the need for systemic heparin.
Hypothesis-generating for local intramural heparin in primary PCI; should not change practice without randomized trials.
The feasibility and safety of local heparin delivery during acute infarct angioplasty was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter, 120-patient series. Angioplasty was performed using standard techniques, after which heparin (4,000 U) was delivered locally; 25% of patients received stents. Procedural success was reported in 98% of patients; 6.7% of patients suffered death, reinfarction, recurrent ischemia, or stroke during the index hospitalization. The 6-month target vessel revascularization rate was 12.5%. Local heparin therapy with provisional stenting in acute myocardial infarction patients is safe, feasible, associated with a low rate of infarct artery revascularization at 6 months, and may potentially eliminate the need for systemic heparin following the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esente et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: