This article provides a personal interpretation of the key findings of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Whitehall Programme. I tell the distinctive story of ‘governance’— of fragmentation, networks, unintended consequences and diplomacy — challenging the dominant, managerial account of change in British govern‐ment since 1979. I present a view of the world in which networks rival markets and bureaucracy as ways of allocating resources and co‐ordinating policy and its implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. A. W. Rhodes (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: