Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this chapter, we describe open-ended measures for assessing the cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes, and the use of these measures to assess a variety of properties relating to attitude structure. In describing the utility of these measures to assess both intergroup and more general attitudes, we highlight situations in which open-ended measures may have advantages over closed-ended measures, as well as identifying situations in which closed-ended measures may be preferable. We conclude by suggesting that researchers interested in fully assessing attitudes would do well to include both open-ended and closed-ended measures in pursuit of this endeavor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esses et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: