Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilot study investigates how cortical oscillations influence effective connectivity in the brain, suggesting advanced stimulation methods.
<ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Background: </ns4:bold> Spontaneous cortical oscillations have been shown to modulate cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, whether these oscillations influence cortical effective connectivity is largely unknown. We conducted a pilot study to set the basis for addressing how spontaneous oscillations affect cortical effective connectivity measured through TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods: </ns4:bold> We applied TMS to the left primary motor cortex and right pre-supplementary motor area of three subjects while recording EEG. We classified trials off-line into positive- and negative-phase classes according to the mu and beta rhythms. We calculated differences in the global mean-field amplitude (GMFA) and compared the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity between the two classes. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results: </ns4:bold> Phase affected the GMFA in four out of 12 datasets (3 subjects × 2 stimulation sites × 2 frequency bands). Two of the observed significant intervals were before 50 ms, two between 50 and 100 ms, and one after 100 ms post-stimulus. Source estimates showed complex spatial differences between the classes in the cortical spreading of the TMS-evoked activity. </ns4:p> <ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions: </ns4:bold> TMS-evoked effective connectivity seems to depend on the phase of local cortical oscillations at the stimulated site. This work paves the way to design future closed-loop stimulation paradigms. </ns4:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Granö et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: