Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative electrophoretic, thermal denaturation, and spectroscopic studies with dodecamers of the form d(ATTA-XGCX-TAAT) and their self-complementary counterparts suggest that actinomycin D (ACTD) binds strongly to a 5'GC3' site with flanking T/T mismatches and moderately to that with C/C mismatches but weakly to those with other G/G or A/A mismatches. The relative binding order is found to be T/T > C/C > G/G > A/A. The ACTD binding affinity for the GC site with T/T mismatches is comparable to the strong binding of self-complementary-XGCY-sequences. Both the ACTD association and dissociation kinetics at the GC site with flanking T/T mismatches require two-exponential fits. The slow component of the association rates is slower than those of the self-complementary sequences, whereas that of the dissociation is only slightly faster than that of the -TGCA- sequence. Interestingly, the slow component of dissociation is decidedly slower than those of -AGCT- and -CGCG- sites and is more than an order of magnitude slower than those with C/C, G/G, and A/A mismatches. These kinetic results are further corroborated by fluorescence measurements using 7-amino-ACTD, a fluorescent analog of ACTD. In addition, fluorescence and absorbance spectral characteristics indicate that the binding mode at the GC site with flanking T/T mismatches resembles those of strong-binding self-complementary -XGCY- sites which are known to be intercalative in nature. The observed slow ACTD dissociation at the T/T-mismatched site suggests that the minor-groove environment near the T/T-mismatched pairs provides favorable interactions with the pentapeptide rings of the drug, whereas the others, especially those of bulkier purine/purine mismatches, result in less favorable interactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: