Key result
PET/CT and PET/MR provide unique and complementary information regarding disease activity in aortic stenosis alongside conventional anatomic assessments.
Why the study?
While echocardiography remains central to aortic stenosis assessment, other multimodality imaging techniques such as combined PET/CT and PET/MR are being explored to assess disease activity alongside conventional anatomic assessments.
How can PET/CT and PET/MRI be used to assess patients with aortic stenosis?
How can PET/CT and PET/MRI be used to assess patients with aortic stenosis?
Combined PET/CT and PET/MR imaging techniques offer complementary data on disease activity and anatomy for the assessment of aortic stenosis.
May support multimodal imaging evaluation in aortic stenosis; leaves open whether PET/CT or PET/MR improves outcomes or guides therapy.
Aortic valve disease is the most common form of heart valve disease in developed countries and a growing healthcare burden with an ageing population. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography remains central to the diagnosis and surveillance of patients with aortic stenosis, providing gold standard assessments of valve haemodynamics and myocardial performance. However, other multimodality imaging techniques are being explored for the assessment of aortic stenosis, including combined PET/CT and PET/MR. Both approaches provide unique information with respect to disease activity in the valve alongside more conventional anatomic assessments of the valve and myocardium in this condition. This review investigates the emerging use of PET/CT and PET/MR to assess patients with aortic stenosis, examining how the complementary data provided by each modality may be used for research applications and potentially in future clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzolos et al. (2019) conducted a review in Aortic valve stenosis. PET/CT and PET/MR vs. Echocardiography was evaluated. PET/CT and PET/MR provide unique and complementary information regarding disease activity in aortic stenosis alongside conventional anatomic assessments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: