Key result
Not having an adjunct health coach compared to having one decreased the risk of nonusage attrition by 36% (HR 0.63) among Black adults using a cardiovascular health app.
Why the study?
Significant attrition plagues internet-based health studies, but the determinants of non-usage attrition in technology-based behavioral interventions for Black adults with cardiovascular risk factors were not well understood.
Does adding a health coach to a mobile-health application reduce nonusage attrition in Black adults with poor cardiovascular health?
RCT (n=132)
Open-label
Time-varying-permuted block size randomization
Yes
Does adding a health coach to a mobile-health application reduce nonusage attrition in Black adults with poor cardiovascular health?
Hazard Ratio: 0.63 (95% CI 0.41–0.98)
p-value: p=0.04
In Black adults with poor cardiovascular health, adding a health coach to a mobile health app paradoxically increased nonusage attrition compared to using the app alone, highlighting the complex dynamics of digital health engagement.
Adding a health coach increased nonusage attrition versus app alone in Black adults; challenges assumptions about adjunct support and warrants refined digital engagement strategies.
Digital health innovations, such as telehealth and remote monitoring, have shown promise in addressing patient barriers to accessing evidence-based programs and providing a scalable path for tailored behavioral interventions that support self-management skills, knowledge acquisition and promotion of relevant behavioral change. However, significant attrition continues to plague internet-based studies, a result we believe can be attributed to characteristics of the intervention, or individual user characteristics. In this paper, we provide the first analysis of determinants of non usage attrition in a randomized control trial of a technology-based intervention for improving self-management behaviors among Black adults who face increased cardiovascular risk factors. We introduce a different way to measure nonusage attrition that considers usage over a specific period of time and estimate a cox proportional hazards model of the impact of intervention factors and participant demographics on the risk of a nonusage event. Our results indicated that not having a coach (compared to having a coach) decreases the risk of becoming an inactive user by 36% (HR = .63, P = 0.04). We also found that several demographic factors can influence Non-usage attrition: The risk of nonusage attrition amongst those who completed some college or technical school (HR = 2.91, P = 0.04) or graduated college (HR = 2.98, P = 0.047) is significantly higher when compared to participants who did not graduate high school. Finally, we found that the risk of nonsage attrition among participants with poor cardiovascular from "at-risk" neighborhoods with higher morbidity and mortality rates related to CVD is significantly higher when compared to participants from "resilient" neighborhoods (HR = 1.99, P = 0.03). Our results underscore the importance of understanding challenges to the use of mhealth technologies for cardiovascular health in underserved communities. Addressing these unique barriers is essential, because a lack of diffusion of digital health innovations exacerbates health disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Idris et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Poor cardiovascular health (n=132). Health360x app without a coach vs. Health360x app with an adjunct health coach was evaluated on Nonusage attrition (time until a nonusage event occurs) (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, p=0.04). Not having an adjunct health coach compared to having one decreased the risk of nonusage attrition by 36% (HR 0.63) among Black adults using a cardiovascular health app.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: