Evaluates distance-adaptive margins to improve coverage in multitarget radiosurgery, suggesting enhanced precision and reduced risk.
Abstract Background and purpose Single isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery improves efficiency for multiple brain metastases, but residual rotational uncertainty increases with target-to-isocenter distance, raising the risk of geometric miss and coverage loss. We derived an analytic model for rotational error propagation and a distance-adaptive geometric margin strategy for risk stratification and quality assurance. Materials and methods Target displacement from residual rotations was derived using rigid body kinematics and validated with a Monte Carlo cohort of one million randomly generated targets uniformly distributed within a 200 mm radius sphere. Rotations were modeled as independent zero-mean Gaussian errors with standard deviations of 0.2°, 0.5°, and 1.0°. Analytic target registration error was compared with the exact rigid body matrix method. Dose-coverage performance was evaluated using V100 % with a 95 % pass criterion. Pass rate under a fixed 1 mm margin was assessed, and the minimum required margin was solved inversely. Results The analytic model closely matched the matrix method, with a maximum residual below 0.2 mm. Risk increased sharply with distance. At 0.5° uncertainty, a failure transition occurred near 100 mm, where mean V100 % remained 95.0 % but pass rate dropped to 52.1 %. The required margin reached 2.14 mm at 100 mm and exceeded 3 mm at 150 mm. Conclusions Distance-dependent amplification of residual rotations causes distal target instability that mean coverage can obscure. Distance-adaptive geometric margins combined with improved rotational accuracy, can reduce distal failure risk while limiting normal tissue cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: