Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows spatiochemical segregation of lithium interphase products, suggesting new strategies for battery stability.
The solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) on lithium metal forms through electrolyte reduction at a dynamically evolving metal surface, yet how its chemistry and spatial organization develop during lithium plating and stripping remains poorly understood. Here, using a 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME)/1 M lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) electrolyte system, we show that three-dimensional lithium growth drives spatiochemical segregation of interphase products into chemically heterogeneous domains that are mechanically reorganized during stripping into a porous electrolyte-retaining framework. Correlative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS), and synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveal that FSI–-derived inorganic species, dominated by LiF, become enriched in regions spatially decoupled from oxygen-containing phases near the lithium surface. Stripping-induced contraction compacts these chemically distinct domains into confined intergranular volumes, where supersaturation promotes precipitation and consolidation, yielding a porous SEI that retains electrolyte-derived species within a buried pore network beyond the reach of surface-sensitive probes. Spatiochemical segregation thus couples interfacial reaction pathways to lithium chemo-mechanics, dictating interphase composition, architecture, and permeability. These findings establish a chemo-mechanical framework for SEI evolution and suggest strategies to mitigate electrolyte retention and interphase instability in lithium–metal batteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: