Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates pH effects on material properties in polymer networks, indicating crucial coordination behavior.
Metal–ligand complexes play an important role in metallo-supramolecular materials, but how the protonation state of protic ligands controls coordination geometry and material properties is still not clearly addressed. In this work, we study the pH-dependent coordination behavior of a protic bidentate ligand, 4-nitro-catechol (nCAT), in polymer networks formed from tetra-arm poly(ethylene glycol) functionalized with nCAT (tetra-nCAT) and iron ions. Hydrogels were prepared with Fe 3+ and Fe 2+ ions and studied using rheology and UV–Vis spectroscopy over a wide pH range. The results show that increasing pH gradually shifts the coordination structure from mono- to bis- and finally tris-complexes. In Fe 3+ systems, this shift leads to higher network connectivity, which appears as a moderate increase in plateau modulus and a strong increase in relaxation time and flow activation energy. Time–temperature superposition shows a single relaxation mode, suggesting that bis and tris complexes interconvert dynamically. In contrast, Fe 2+ networks are significantly weaker and show lower connectivity, consistent with a lower coordination strength, while they are surprisingly more stable and more temperature dependent. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations unveil that the partially deprotonated ligand can contribute as a bidentate chelating ligand, including specifically the coordination of sulfate counterions, which stabilizes bis and mono complexes, particularly in the presence of Fe 2+ . Together, these results provide a multiscale picture of how ligand deprotonation controls coordination geometry and how this molecular change is reflected in the macroscopic properties of metallo-supramolecular polymer networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schäfer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: