Examines stock market reactions in China, indicating sentiment amplifies geopolitical impacts.
This study examines how the Russia-Ukraine conflict affects China’s stock market and whether investor sentiment amplifies the pricing of this geopolitical shock. Using an event-study framework for 2,430 A-share firms and panel regressions with stock-level sentiment extracted from East Money message-board posts, we document three findings. First, the conflict triggers a significant market-wide decline, with higher losses for larger firms and firms with greater overseas revenue exposure. Second, commodity-linked industries, such as energy and non-ferrous metals, generate positive abnormal returns, indicating that the shock creates both losers and temporary winners. Third, the return-sentiment relation strengthens sharply after the outbreak, and the strongest reversals occur in portfolios with the most extreme sentiment, consistent with sentiment-driven overreaction rather than a purely fundamental repricing. The results are robust to alternative sentiment measures, asset-pricing benchmarks, and controls for geopolitical risk and China’s economic policy uncertainty. The study contributes to the literature by providing, to our knowledge, the first firm-level evidence on how the Russia-Ukraine conflict is transmitted into China’s A-share market through social-media-based investor sentiment. More broadly, it demonstrates that in a retail-dominated emerging market, geopolitical shocks can generate both market-wide losses and temporary sectoral overpricing, with investor sentiment serving as a crucial amplification mechanism. The findings provide a framework for future research on how war shocks are incorporated into stock prices through real exposure and behavioral amplification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: