Supplementary lecture explores the limits of a dynamic causality model in time travel and paradoxes, suggesting new interpretations.
This paper serves as a supplementary lecture to *Temporal Asynchrony and Individual Independence* (Revised Edition, Amendment V1), extending the **Dynamic Causal Propagation Model** to its limiting cases. Building on two foundational premises established in the parent work — (1) that causal influence propagates at a finite velocity (one second per second, forward in time), and (2) that the world possesses no metacognitive faculty and merely outputs whatever input it receives — this paper systematically derives the consequences of applying these premises to iterated time travel and self-homicide scenarios. Under the finite-velocity model, the "simple circular loop" presupposed in much science fiction cannot obtain. In its place, the paper demonstrates the emergence of an **Intermittent Loop**: a three-phase pulse structure consisting of an On-phase, Off-phase, and Restoration-phase. Analysis of the self-homicide paradox reveals that what is eliminated is not the time traveler but a distinct physical entity belonging to that temporal coordinate, thereby dissolving the apparent contradiction without additional postulates. The paper further demonstrates that encounters between multiple instances of the same individual within a single spacetime are processed by the world as nothing more than multiple co-present physical data sets, generating no logical inconsistency. The logic of return travel is treated under the same framework: the influences of departure and arrival propagate independently; the time traveler's present is shielded from the advancing causal wave while their past is not; and repeated time travel produces cumulative divergence from the original state. Throughout, the world recognizes none of this as anomalous — it outputs only the present state. All conclusions derived herein require no supplementary assumptions; they follow by pure deduction from the two foundational premises. What appears as a time paradox is, invariably, nothing more than a succession of local state transitions, which the world continues to output, indifferently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
The Great Imitation Museum (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: