Compares moisture content and fracture resistance in treated teeth with different irrigants, indicating the impact of irrigant choice on tooth integrity.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the moisture content between endodontically treated and sound teeth and evaluate the effect of different irrigants - 3% Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA), and their combination on fracture resistance. Methods: Twenty-eight mandibular premolars were divided into four groups: Group 1 (control, saline), Group 2 (3% NaOCl), Group 3 (17% EDTA), and Group 4 (combined NaOCl + EDTA). Moisture content was measured by weight difference before and after heating. Fracture resistance was tested using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using paired t -tests and one-way ANOVA (SPSS v27.0), with significance set at * P * ≤0.05. Results: Endodontically treated teeth showed significantly lower moisture content (Group IV: 5.75%) compared to controls (7.31%, * P * <0.0001). Fracture resistance was the highest in Group 1 (304.00 N) and lowest in Group 4 (198.00 N, * P * <0.0001). Conclusion: Endodontic treatment reduces moisture content and fracture resistance, with combined NaOCl + EDTA causing the most significant decline. These findings highlight the need for careful irrigant selection to preserve tooth integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mazumdar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: