Generative modeling facilitates regional-scale earthquake wavefield synthesis, suggesting advancements in seismic hazard workflows.
Reliable earthquake ground-motion time histories are essential for seismic hazard analysis, structural design, and the risk assessment of distributed infrastructure systems. However, observed records of large earthquakes remain sparse, while physics-based simulations are computationally expensive and difficult to deploy at the scale required for uncertainty quantification. This thesis develops generative modeling frameworks for efficient, scenario-specific synthesis of earthquake ground motion, with an emphasis on neural operators, function-space learning, and scalable regional wavefield generation. The work begins with conditional generative adversarial neural operators for broadband three-component ground-motion synthesis at individual sites, conditioned on earthquake source, path, and site parameters. It then develops broader methodological foundations for functional generative modeling, including operator flow matching for stochastic-process learning and mesh-informed neural operators for domain- and discretization-agnostic generation on complex geometries. Building on these advances, the thesis introduces Ground-Motion Flow, a physics-inspired latent operator flow-matching framework for regional coherent ground-motion synthesis. By generating wavefields in a physics-aligned latent representation and reconstructing full spatiotemporal motions through neural operators, the framework produces spatially coherent earthquake wavefields conditioned on physical parameters with orders-of-magnitude acceleration relative to direct numerical simulation. Together, these studies establish a progression from single-site waveform synthesis to regional-scale, uncertainty-aware ground-motion wavefield generation. The results demonstrate the potential of functional generative models to complement physics-based simulation and empirical ground-motion modeling, opening a path toward fast, probabilistic, and scalable seismic hazard workflows for resilient infrastructure systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaozhong Shi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: