Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial shows exenatide enhances dietary choices and activity in adolescents with obesity, suggesting potential for effective lifestyle interventions.
Introduction: We aimed to study the effects of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide on behavioral outcomes in children and adolescents with obesity. Methods: This study reports pre-specified secondary outcomes of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in adolescents with obesity, aged 10-18 years old. Participants (n=44) were randomized to six months treatment with exenatide or placebo, along with a lifestyle intervention consisting of nutritional advice from a dietitian and sessions with a psychologist to optimize physical activity. Change in choices of food and drink, portion sizes, meal frequency, sleep, screen time, and physical activity were assessed by 6-minute walking test, accelerometry and questionnaires. Results: Exenatide treatment was associated with improved adherence to choices of recommended food and drinks (score change 4.34, 95% CI 1.05 – 7.63, p=0.01, Hedges’ g 0.82, 95% CI 0.17 – 1.49), decreased portion size (score change -4.05, 95% CI -6.51 – -1.58, p=0.002, Hedges’ g -1.29, 95% CI -2.13 – -0.45), and increased self-reported physical activity (1.82 hours, 95% CI 0.68 – 2.96, p=0.002 Hedges’ g 0.97, 95% CI 0.33 – 1.62), while no differences in meal frequency, snacking, sleep, screen time, objectively measured physical fitness or activity were found. Conclusion: Exenatide treatment was associated with modest improvements in selected self-reported dietary behaviors, including improved adherence to recommended food and drink choices and reduced portion sizes, as well as increased self-reported physical activity, although no changes were observed in objective measures of physical activity or other lifestyle factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenlid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: