Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates NLRC5's role in tumor control, highlighting immune cell activation and tumor growth impacts.
Introduction Tumors downregulate NLRC5 expression to reduce MHC-I and evade CD8+ T cell-mediated killing. Introducing full-length NLRC5 (N5FL) or NLRC5-CIITA chimeric protein (N5CA) can restore tumor immunogenicity. Here, we elucidated the underlying mechanisms and also evaluated the requirement of NLRC5 expression in antigen-presenting cells (APC) of the host for tumor control. Methods Nlrc5−/− and Nlrc5+/+ mice were implanted with B16-F10 melanoma expressing N5FL or N-C5A. Tumor growth, activation of lymphoid cells, their infiltration into tumors and the requirement for tumor control were assessed. The proteomes of B16-F10 cells expressing N5FL or N5CA were analyzed. Results NLRC5-expressing tumors were efficiently controlled in both Nlrc5+/+ and Nlrc5−/− mice, characterized by infiltration of CD8+ and CD4+ cells, NK, NKT and iNKT cells, increased tumor vascularization and upregulation of Ccl4 and Cxcl9 genes. Both CD8+ and NK1.1+ cells contribute to NLRC5-dependent tumor control. NLRC5 expression in TCGA-SKCM correlated with NK cell markers and non-classical MHC-Ib expression. Proteomes of NLRC5-expressing tumor cells showed downmodulation of dominant tumor antigens, but displayed significant changes in the lysosome and proteasome, upregulated the protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum and downregulated the autophagy pathways, which could impact the MHC-I antigen processing and presentation. Conclusions NLRC5 expression in APCs is dispensable for NLRC5-dependent antitumor immunity. NLRC5-dependent tumor control requires both CD8+ and NK1.1+ cells. Tumor-intrinsic NLRC5 promotes vasculature that is permissive to infiltration by antitumor immune cells. In addition to upregulating MHC-I, NLRC5 may enhance alternative antigen processing pathways and attenuate autophagic degradation of MHC-I, thereby augmenting tumor immunogenicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shukla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: