Shows improved nutrient uptake in wheat under nickel exposure, suggesting effective bacterial interventions.
Due to the increased anthropogenic load, crops are polluted with heavy metals, including nickel (Ni). This is a serious environmental problem, as Ni penetrates barrier-free into cereal crops and accumulates in the grains used by humans and animals for food. Wheat is one of the main staple crops, cultivated in many countries. This study suggested that plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) with varying enzymatic activities could help wheat plants to cope with Ni stress by reducing Ni toxicity and regulating the metal’s homeostasis. PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 has a strong phosphate-solubilizing activity and produces siderophores, while Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 has nitrogen-fixing and silicate-solubilizing activities. Both strains produce indole and polysaccharides and have 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity. PGPB under Ni exposure (100 mg/kg of soil) significantly increased grain yield (by 34–42%) and decreased (by 20–33%) Ni content in wheat grains. PGPB also decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2 levels in wheat plants under Ni stress. The contents of iron (Fe), boron (B), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) decreased significantly and potassium (K) and zinc (Zn) oppositely increased significantly in all plant organs under Ni exposure. The inoculation with AFI1 mainly increased P and Fe, and the inoculation with AFI2 increased N and silica (Si) in wheat grains under Ni stress. In our experiments, under nickel exposure PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 increased antioxidant protection of plants by decreasing the level of stress ethylene and regulating the homeostasis of nutrients in wheat plants. These PGPB can be considered as promising candidates for the development of biologicals to be used for growing plants in soils with low levels of nickel contamination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pishchik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: