Randomized trial assesses cost-effectiveness of acoramidis in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, highlighting affordability issues.
BACKGROUND: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) causes heart failure with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. ATTRibute-CM showed that acoramidis improves clinical outcomes, but its cost-effectiveness and budget impact in the German statutory health insurance (SHI) system remain uncertain. METHODS: We developed a cohort Markov model (lifetime horizon) discounting costs and outcomes at 3% annually. Overall survival was modeled with recalibrated Weibull functions fitted to randomized-phase ATTRibute-CM data and anchored to match month-30 survival. Health-related quality of life used Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) trajectories mapped to EQ-5D utilities, with a plateau after 30 months in the base case. Direct medical costs (2025€) included drug, background management and hospitalization costs. Uncertainty was assessed with sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses and a budget impact analysis. RESULTS: Discounted mean lifetime costs were €13,881.50 (placebo) and €828,127.07 (acoramidis), for an incremental €814,245.57. QALYs increased from 2.743 to 4.029 (incremental 1.286) and life-years from 4.023 to 6.045 (incremental 2.022), yielding an ICER of €633,081 per QALY. Survival scenario analyses produced lifetime ICERs from €458,953/QALY in an optimistic scenario to €2,139,712/QALY in a pessimistic waning-benefit scenario. At a WTP of €100,000/QALY, the probability of cost-effectiveness was very low and results were driven primarily by acoramidis acquisition cost. In the budget impact analysis, year-1 SHI expenditure was €80,813,995, €134,689,992, and €269,379,983 for 30%, 50%, and 100% uptake, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite benefits, acoramidis is unlikely to be cost-effective at current prices in Germany and could increase SHI spending. Price reductions could better align value with affordability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: