Randomized trial identifies effective cutpoints for biomarkers in advanced breast cancer, suggesting improved treatment decisions.
Treatment effect heterogeneity has often been observed in clinical settings, which can be explained, at least partially, by predictive biomarkers. Although a variety of continuous biomarkers are measured in clinical practice, using biomarkers to guide treatment decisions remains challenging. We consider specifying a statistically and clinically suitable cutpoint of a continuous biomarker by identifying a sensitive subpopulation. We use a Bayesian posterior probability to analyze a time-to-event outcome and biomarkers observed in a randomized clinical trial. The proposed method aims not only to control the false-positive rate under a desired level, thereby deriving a statistically suitable decision rule, but also to incorporate a minimum clinically important difference, thereby providing a clinically reasonable interpretation. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the operating characteristics of the proposed method under a wide range of clinical scenarios. For illustration, we apply the proposed method to data from a phase III randomized clinical trial involving patients with advanced breast cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: