Case report demonstrates effective surgical resolution of rectal prolapse in a cat using a two-port approach, indicating a promising option for rapid recovery.
OBJECTIVE: To describe a modified totally laparoscopic colonopexy technique performed using only two ports for the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse in a cat, aimed at minimizing surgical access and postoperative morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. ANIMALS OR SAMPLE POPULATION: One adult feral domestic shorthair cat. METHODS: A 3.4-kg adult male cat, with recurrent rectal prolapse following failure of conservative management, underwent a totally laparoscopic colonopexy using a two-port configuration. The procedure was performed through two 5-mm ports without colonic exteriorization. Serosal preparation of the descending colon and the left abdominal wall was achieved using monopolar electrocautery, followed by intracorporeal fixation with a continuous barbed polydioxanone suture. Surgical time, intraoperative findings, and postoperative outcome were recorded. Follow-up included clinical evaluation and abdominal ultrasonography. RESULTS: The procedure was completed without intraoperative complications, with a total surgical time of 43 min. Postoperative handling and medical management were limited due to the patient's aggressive behaviour. The cat resumed voluntary feeding within 6 h postoperatively and showed no signs of tenesmus or recurrence of rectal prolapse during short-term follow-up. Ultrasonographic evaluation at 30 days confirmed stable fibrous adhesion between the descending colon and the abdominal wall, with no evidence of recurrence or complications. CONCLUSIONS: A two-port totally laparoscopic colonopexy provided effective stabilization of the colon and successful resolution of recurrent rectal prolapse in this cat. This approach may represent a valuable minimally invasive alternative in selected feline patients, particularly those with behavioural limitations that restrict postoperative handling and medical management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maximiliano Adrián Cifuentes Laponio (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: