Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates deterministic multi-state itinerancy in dynamic systems, suggesting new control methods.
We present a curvature‑basin dynamical framework in which a slowly evolving symbolic‑energy variable reshapes the depths of competing attractor basins, producing **deterministic multi‑state itinerancy** without noise, external forcing, or parameter modulation. The key result is a **necessary and sufficient phase‑flow condition**: itinerancy occurs *iff* the sign pattern of symbolic‑energy drift coefficients generates a non‑vanishing velocity on the circle \(S^1\), preventing stable fixed points in the averaged slow flow. A complete sweep of all eight sign patterns for a three‑basin system confirms this prediction exactly. In the adiabatic limit, the cycling period obeys the closed‑form law \[T = 2π/ε |v|,\] verified numerically with \(R^2 = 1.0000\) and 0.5% mean residual. This establishes symbolic‑energy feedback as a **programmable itinerary selector** with precise control over both cycle existence and period. As a consistency check, we show via center‑manifold reduction and Hopf normal‑form analysis that the curvature‑basin equations share the same **local Hopf universality class** as unified breather models of mode‑locked fiber lasers. This provides local physical grounding without implying global equivalence. Symbolic‑energy feedback thus offers a compact, predictive mechanism for autonomous attractor sequencing, with potential applications in neuromorphic dynamics, reservoir computing, nonlinear photonics, and adaptive control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luiz PUODZIUS (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: