Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates machine learning for diagnosing SEM non-convergence, suggesting practical remediation techniques.
Non-convergence in small-sample structural equation modeling (SEM) is frequently driven by localized pathologies in the sample covariance matrix—specific covariance patterns that, for a given model specification, substantially elevate the risk of non-convergence. We propose a diagnose–localize–shrinkage framework in which a machine learning classifier predicts SEM non-convergence and SHAP values localize the covariance pairs that drive this prediction. Sample covariance matrices are generated independently of the fitted SEM and modified through controlled pathology injection. A fixed SEM is then fitted to each matrix, and the resulting convergence status is used as the prediction target. The classifier is trained on the unique off-diagonal elements of the corresponding correlation matrix. The SHAP-identified covariance pairs are then used to construct a local shrinkage step toward a well-conditioned model-based target matrix to evaluate whether SEM convergence can be restored with limited distortion of the original covariance pattern. We demonstrate the proposed method using an illustrative example.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vanbrabant et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: