Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates cardiac function and adaptations in female mice lacking RHOT proteins, indicating an unexpected resilience against heart failure during pregnancy.
Pregnancy-associated hemodynamic overload and hormonal changes induce hypertrophy and metabolic remodeling of the maternal heart. Mitochondrial motility, mediated by ras homolog family member T (RHOT) 1 and RHOT2, is essential for cardiac adaptation to increased workload, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and sarcomere maturation. To test the hypothesis that Rhot1/2 expression is required for pregnancy- and postpartum-associated adaptations of the maternal heart, female mice with tamoxifen-inducible, cardiomyocyte-selective deletion of Rhot1 and Rhot2 (iRhot1/2-KO) were mated. Following gene deletion in adult mice, cardiac tissue and function were analyzed after three to five successive pregnancies and postpartum nursing periods. Age-matched nulliparous iRhot1/2-KO mice and age-matched mice expressing Rhot1 and Rhot2 served as controls. Motility of mitochondria isolated from iRhot1/2-KO hearts was impaired, as determined by the number of mobile mitochondria in an in vitro motor protein-driven single mitochondrion motility assay performed on surface-immobilized microtubules. Despite loss of Rhot1/2 expression, contractile function assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, mRNA expression of peripartum-associated heart failure markers, cardiac structure, mitochondrial morphology, mitochondrial enzymatic activity, and mitochondrial DNA content were all comparable to controls expressing Rhot1/2 at the investigated time points. RNA sequencing-based gene profiling identified a transcriptional program through which RHOT proteins preserve cardiac energetic and contraction gene expression during pregnancy and postpartum. Together, cardiomyocyte-selective loss of Rhot1/2 expression in the adult heart does not cause peripartum-associated heart failure, despite reduced cardiac energetic and contraction gene expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Froese et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: