This study reports on the distribution of Kolb's four learning styles and four learning types for a sample of 437 volunteer management undergraduates divided by sex, hard-soft majors, and by major including accounting, finance, marketing and management information system. The overall results showed a preference for the assimilator learning style (35.4%) and 'thinking' learning type (62.8%). There was no sex difference in the distribution of styles or types, but there was a difference in the hard-soft majors distinction such that there was a higher proportion of women in the soft majors and a higher proportion of men in the hard majors. Among accounting majors there was a preference for the assimilator style (38.5%). Frequencies for the other majors were not large enough to allow separate analyses. Implications are noted for educators, trainers and learners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Loo (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: