Nature conservation in the UK comprises not only a response to the perceived impacts of rationalization on nature but is itself a dimension of that process of rationalization. The paper describes the development of conservation institutions and ideologies in the UK and considers the ways in which ecology (and particularly ideas of nature as equilibrium) have provided the intellectual framework for conservation. Ecology underpinned the establishment of government conservation institutions, provided intellectual strategies for classifying and objectifying nature, and provided the knowledge base for the control and management of nature. The paper discusses the implications of non‐equilibrial ideas in ecology for ideas and practice in conservation and the implications of responses to them in the form of re‐rationalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William M. Adams (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: