Key result
Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass was more strongly associated with incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.14-2.04) than with isolated atherosclerotic disease.
Why the study?
Traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic disease (AD) are well known and some are relevant to abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), but their comparative importance alongside plasma biomarkers for incident isolated AD versus incident isolated AAA was unclear.
What are the differential associations of plasma biomarkers and traditional risk factors with incident isolated atherosclerotic disease versus incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Cohort (n=5,381)
What are the differential associations of plasma biomarkers and traditional risk factors with incident isolated atherosclerotic disease versus incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Hazard Ratio: 1.53 (95% CI 1.14–2.04)
Vascular inflammation and cardiovascular stress markers drive AAA development, whereas diabetes may have a protective role against AAA despite increasing atherosclerotic disease risk.
Lp-PLA2 mass may distinguish isolated AAA from atherosclerotic risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: Traditional risk factors for atherosclerotic disease (AD) are well-known, of which some are relevant also for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The present study compares the importance of plasma biomarkers and traditional risk factor profiles for incident AD without concomitant AAA (isolated AD) and AAA without concomitant AD (isolated AAA) during long-term follow-up. Methods: In the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study—cardiovascular cohort, 5,381 participants were free from atrial fibrillation or flutter, AD (coronary artery disease, atherothrombotic ischemic stroke, carotid artery disease, or peripheral artery disease), and AAA underwent blood sampling under standardized fasting conditions between 1991 and 1994. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs. Results: During a median follow-up of 23.1 years, 1,152 participants developed isolated AD, and 44 developed isolated AAA. Adjusted HR for lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (mass) (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.14–2.04 vs. HR 1.05, 95% CI.99–1.12) was higher for incident isolated AAA compared to incident isolated AD, respectively. Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) was associated with incident isolated AD (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.1–1.25) and incident isolated AAA (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.15–1.88). MR-proADM was correlated ( r = 0.32; p < 0.001) to body mass index (BMI), and BMI was associated with increased risk of incident isolated AAA (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02–2). No participant with diabetes mellitus (DM) at baseline developed isolated AAA (0/44), whereas DM was associated with an increased risk of isolated AD (HR 2.57, 95% CI 2.08–3.18). Adjusted HR for male sex (HR 4.8, 95% CI 2.42–9.48, vs. HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.56–1.98) and current smoking (HR 4.79, 95% CI 2.42–9.47 vs. HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.73–2.23) were higher in the incident isolated AAA group compared to the incident isolated AD group, respectively. Conclusions: The data supports the view that components of vascular inflammation and cardiovascular stress drives AAA development, whereas glycated cross-links in abdominal aortic wall tissue may have a plausible role in reducing AAA risk in individuals with DM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acosta et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Incident isolated atherosclerotic disease and incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=5,381). Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (mass) was evaluated on Incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.14-2.04). Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 mass was more strongly associated with incident isolated abdominal aortic aneurysm (HR 1.53; 95% CI 1.14-2.04) than with isolated atherosclerotic disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: