Key result
SMC-01 smartphone app shows no benefit over paper journals for improving HbA1c.
Why the study?
Mobile apps may help overcome difficulties in long-term type 2 diabetes self-management, but similar apps entering the Japanese market are yet to be classified as medical devices.
Does the SMC-01 mobile app improve hemoglobin A1c compared to paper journals in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
RCT
randomized
Yes
Does the SMC-01 mobile app improve hemoglobin A1c compared to paper journals in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
The SMC-01 smartphone app did not significantly improve glycemic control compared to paper journals in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SMC-01 app shows no HbA1c benefit over paper journals; does not support routine use and challenges digital self-monitoring superiority in T2DM.
BACKGROUND Lifestyle modifications are a key part of type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment. Many patients find long-term self-management difficult, and mobile apps could be a solution. In 2010, in the United States, a mobile app was approved as an official medical device. Similar apps have entered the Japanese market but are yet to be classified as medical devices. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of Save Medical Corporation (SMC)–01, a mobile app for the support of lifestyle modifications among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS This was a 24-week multi-institutional, prospective randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received SMC-01, an app with functions allowing patients to record data and receive personalized feedback to encourage a healthier lifestyle. The control group used paper journals for diabetes self-management. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to week 12. RESULTS The change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to week 12 was –0.05% (95% CI –0.14% to 0.04%) in the intervention group and 0.06% (95% CI –0.04% to 0.15%) in the control group. The between-group difference in change was –0.11% (95% CI –0.24% to 0.03%; P=.11). CONCLUSIONS There was no statistically significant change in glycemic control. The lack of change could be due to SMC-01 insufficiently inducing behavior change, absence of screening for patients who have high intention to change their lifestyle, low effective usage of SMC-01 due to design issues, or problems with the SMC-01 intervention. Future efforts should focus on these issues in the early phase of developing interventions. CLINICALTRIAL Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCT2032200033; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2032200033
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Save Medical Corporation (SMC)-01 smartphone app vs. paper journals for diabetes self-management was evaluated on between-group difference in change in hemoglobin A1c from baseline to week 12 (MD -0.11%, 95% CI -0.24% to 0.03%, p=.11). The SMC-01 smartphone app did not significantly improve hemoglobin A1c compared to paper journals at 12 weeks (mean difference -0.11%; 95% CI -0.24% to 0.03%; P=.11).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: