Key result
A smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app did not significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared to control (mean change -7.19 vs -10.95 mmHg, P=0.16).
Why the study?
Metabolic disorders are precursors to cardiovascular disease that can be prevented with lifestyle changes, but the effectiveness of a smartphone weight management app in high-risk community adults without diagnosed metabolic syndrome was unassessed.
Does a smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app reduce systolic blood pressure in community-dwelling adults with moderate metabolic abnormalities?
RCT (n=129)
single-blind
block randomization
Does a smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app reduce systolic blood pressure in community-dwelling adults with moderate metabolic abnormalities?
Absolute Event Rate: -7.19% vs -10.95%
p-value: p=0.16
A smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app did not significantly reduce systolic blood pressure compared to control in adults with moderate metabolic abnormalities, though it showed potential for weight and body fat reduction.
App-based coaching reduced weight and fat mass but not blood pressure; extends digital lifestyle evidence in undiagnosed high-risk adults.
BACKGROUND Metabolic disorders are established precursors to cardiovascular diseases, yet they can be readily prevented with sustained lifestyle modifications. OBJECTIVE We assessed the effectiveness of a smartphone-based weight management app on metabolic parameters in adults at high-risk, yet without physician diagnosis nor pharmacological treatment for metabolic syndrome, in a community setting. METHODS In this 3-arm parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, we recruited participants aged 30 to 59 years with at least 2 conditions defined by the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program expert panel (abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high fasting glucose level). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by block randomization to either the nonuser group (control), the app-based diet and exercise self-logging group (app only), or the app-based self-logging and personalized coaching from professional dieticians and exercise coordinators group (app with personalized coaching). Assessments were performed at baseline, week 6, week 12, and week 24. The primary outcome was change in systolic blood pressure (between baseline and follow-up assessments). Secondary outcomes were changes in diastolic blood pressure, body weight, body fat mass, waist circumference, homeostatic model of assessment of insulin resistance, triglyceride level, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level between baseline and follow-up assessments. Analysis was performed using intention-to-treat. RESULTS Between October 28, 2017 and May 28, 2018, 160 participants participated in the baseline screening examination. Participants (129/160, 80.6%) who satisfied the eligibility criteria were assigned to control (n=41), app only (n=45), or app with personalized coaching (n=43) group. In each group, systolic blood pressure showed decreasing trends from baseline (control: mean –10.95, SD 2.09 mmHg; app only: mean –7.29, SD 1.83 mmHg; app with personalized coaching: mean –7.19, SD 1.66 mmHg), yet without significant difference among the groups (app only: P=.19; app with personalized coaching: P=.16). Instead, those in the app with personalized coaching group had greater body weight reductions (control: mean –0.12, SD 0.30 kg; app only: mean –0.35, SD 0.36 kg, P=.67; app with personalized coaching: mean –0.96, SD 0.37 kg; P=.08), specifically by body fat mass reduction (control: mean –0.13, SD 0.34 kg; app only: mean –0.64, SD 0.38 kg, P=.22; app with personalized coaching: mean –0.79, SD 0.38 kg; P=.08). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous diet and exercise self-logging and persistent lifestyle modification coaching were ineffective in lowering systolic blood pressure but effective in losing weight and reducing body fat mass. These results warrant future implementation studies of similar models of care on a broader scale in the context of primary prevention. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03300271; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03300271
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in moderate metabolic abnormalities (n=129). smartphone-based weight management app with personalized coaching vs. nonuser group (control) was evaluated on change in systolic blood pressure (p=0.16). A smartphone-based lifestyle coaching app did not significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared to control (mean change -7.19 vs -10.95 mmHg, P=0.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: