Key result
App-based individualized nutrition achieves ~7% weight loss at 12 weeks, beating standard control.
Why the study?
Evidence on the efficacy of mobile health applications for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor improvement remains limited.
Does an individualized, nutrient-optimized dietary intervention with gradual energy reduction improve weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight or obese adults compared to general dietary recommendations?
RCT (n=80)
Open-label
Permuted block randomization
No
Does an individualized, nutrient-optimized dietary intervention with gradual energy reduction improve weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight or obese adults compared to general dietary recommendations?
Absolute Event Rate: -6.5% vs -2.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
An individualized, nutrient-optimized dietary intervention with gradual energy reduction achieved clinically meaningful weight loss and improved blood lipid levels in overweight adults, regardless of the delivery method (app-based vs. personal coaching).
Supports individualized menu plans for weight loss in overweight adults; confirms efficacy of structured diets independent of delivery mode.
Introduction Overweight is a major public health concern. Beyond traditional dietary therapy, mobile health (mHealth) applications have gained interest for their potential to support weight loss. However, evidence on their efficacy remains limited. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an app-based dietary concept for weight reduction and improvement of further cardiovascular risk factors. Methods: The PreVa study is a single-center, randomized, four-arm parallel intervention study comparing an app-based nutrition program with standard therapy involving personal counseling. Eighty adults with a body mass index between 25 and < 35 kg/m 2 were randomly assigned to one of four groups (1) app-based, (2) individual coaching, (3) general dietary recommendations and (4) control. All intervention groups received individualized, nutrient-optimized menu plans with integrated flaxseed oil supplementation, either via app or in printed form, combined with varying levels of counseling. Energy intake was gradually reduced every 4 weeks, with maintenance phases at the beginning and end of the 16-week intervention. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured at four-week intervals. Results After 12 weeks of energy reduction, weight loss was significantly greater in the intervention groups (−6.5 %, −7.3 %, −6.0 %) than in the control group (−2.1 %; p < 0.001) and remained stable during the maintenance phase (16 weeks; all p < 0.01). A clinically relevant (> 5 %) weight loss was achieved by 66.7 %, 78.9 %, and 53.3 % of participants for all interventions, respectively. Blood pressure was reduced in all intervention groups ( p < 0.05), while the values differ not significantly from control group. Total and LDL cholesterol decreased in group 2 and 3 ( p < 0.05), the changes differ significantly from the control group. Group 1 exhibited a significant decrease in fasting glucose and HOMA-IR compared to the other groups. α-Linolenic concentrations increased markedly (+ 52.7–79.4 %; p ≤ 0.01), whereas eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid remained unchanged. No relevant changes were observed in micronutrient status. Conclusion The intervention groups achieved clinically meaningful weight loss and an improvement in blood lipid levels. The greatest effect is likely attributable to the individualized, nutrient-optimized menu plans rather than the type of counseling or delivery mode. Clinical trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , identifier NCT04717076
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klein et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Overweight or obesity (n=80). App-based nutritional concept with individualized menu plans vs. General dietary recommendations (control) was evaluated on Percentage weight loss after 12 weeks (p=<0.001). An app-based nutritional concept with individualized menu plans significantly reduced body weight by 6.5% compared to 2.1% in the control group after 12 weeks of energy reduction.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: