Key result
Heartbeat Resonance delivers realistic non-contact chest sensations, performing best at ~78 Hz.
Why the study?
Wearable devices for perceiving and altering internal physiological states like heartbeats are often intrusive and fail to deliver stimuli aligned with the heart's location in the chest.
Heartbeat Resonance successfully uses low-frequency sound waves to induce realistic, non-contact haptic heartbeat sensations in the user's chest cavity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables non-contact cardiac biofeedback development; leaves open clinical validation and therapeutic utility.
Perceiving and altering the sensation of internal physiological states, such as heartbeats, is key for biofeedback and interoception. Yet, wearable devices used for this purpose can feel intrusive and typically fail to deliver stimuli aligned with the heart’s location in the chest. To address this, we introduce Heartbeat Resonance, which uses low-frequency sound waves to create non-contact haptic sensations in the chest cavity, mimicking heartbeats. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the system’s effectiveness. The first experiment shows that the system created realistic heartbeat sensations in the chest, with 78.05 Hz being the most effective frequency. In the second experiment, we evaluate the effects of entrainment by simulating faster and slower heart rates. Participants perceived the intended changes and reported high confidence in their perceptions for +15% and -30% heart rates. This system offers a non-intrusive solution for biofeedback while creating new possibilities for immersive VR environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2025) studied Healthy volunteers (n=14). Heartbeat Resonance (low-frequency sound waves) vs. Real heartbeat sound signal was evaluated on Perceived realism of the heartbeat sensations. Heartbeat Resonance created realistic non-contact haptic heartbeat sensations in the chest, with 78.05 Hz being the most effective frequency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: