Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Are the sparse properties drawn from all the levels of nature, or only the fundamental level? I discuss the notion of sparse property found in Armstrong and Lewis, show that there are tensions in the roles they have assigned the sparse properties, and argue that the sparse properties should be drawn from all the levels of nature. The issue has direct bearing on reductionism. If the sparse properties are drawn from all the levels of nature, then macro‐scientific properties are just as primary as micro‐scientific properties, and do not need to be reduced to them.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Schaffer (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: