Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article investigates the paradoxical outcomes of a mechanism to promote women's participation in payment for ecosystem services (). Focusing specifically on the Legal Representative position, I examine how gendered and generational power dynamics become reinscribed through this position and the various ways that this position is conceptualized, performed, and negotiated. To do this, I combine theoretical insights from feminist theories of subjectivity, political ecology, and forest governance with empirical evidence from a small case study of in Jalisco, Mexico. I find that the subjectivity of women within the case study both produce and are produced by gendered and generational differences that simultaneously both challenge and also maintain social‐spatial exclusions. Although this study is limited by its focus on the Legal Representative and a small sample size, such a focused case study sheds light on the social and spatial ways in which runs the risk of exacerbating already existing inequities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beth A. Bee (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: