Why the study?
Optimizing systolic blood pressure in HF with preserved ejection fraction carries a Class I recommendation but with limited evidence, and SGLT2 inhibitors have antihypertensive effects across cardiovascular disease.
Does dapagliflozin improve cardiovascular outcomes consistently across different baseline systolic blood pressure categories in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Does dapagliflozin improve cardiovascular outcomes consistently across different baseline systolic blood pressure categories in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction?
Dapagliflozin is efficacious and safe in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction regardless of baseline systolic blood pressure, and its benefits are not solely due to its blood pressure-lowering effects.
Consistent dapagliflozin benefit across SBP categories in HFmrEF/HFpEF may support broader use; leaves open independence from modest BP reduction.
BACKGROUND: Optimizing systolic blood pressure (SBP) in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction carries a Class I recommendation but with limited evidence. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have antihypertensive effects across cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVES: The authors examined the interplay between SBP and treatment effects of dapagliflozin on SBP and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: The authors analyzed 6,263 DELIVER (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure) participants and related baseline and mean achieved SBP categories (<120, 120-129, 130-139, ≥140 mm Hg) to the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or worsening HF), secondary outcomes, and safety events. They analyzed whether the blood pressure-lowering effects of dapagliflozin accounted for its treatment effects by adjusting for the change in SBP from baseline to 1 month. RESULTS: The average age was 72 ± 10 years and 44% were women. SBP <120 mm Hg was associated with higher HF and mortality events, although amputation and stroke risk increased with higher SBP. Dapagliflozin reduced SBP by 1.8 (95% CI: 1.1-2.5) mm Hg compared with placebo at 1 month. The treatment effect of dapagliflozin on the primary outcome and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score was consistent across SBP (interaction P = 0.15 and P = 0.98, respectively). Adverse events between arms were similar across SBP categories. The treatment effect was not accounted for by reducing blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In DELIVER, risk by SBP was augmented in the lowest and highest categories and varied by endpoint examined. Dapagliflozin modestly decreased SBP compared with placebo. Dapagliflozin was similarly efficacious and safe across the range of baseline SBP. The beneficial effects of dapagliflozin were not accounted for the changes in SBP. (Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the LIVEs of Patients With PReserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure [DELIVER]; NCT03619213).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvaraj et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: