Why the study?
Saline flushing is clinically ineffective for hemodialysis patients at high bleeding risk with heparin contraindications, while standard regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-one) frequently results in serious venous chamber clotting.
Does modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) reduce serious clotting events compared to RCA-one or saline flushing in hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding?
Does modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) reduce serious clotting events compared to RCA-one or saline flushing in hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding?
Modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) significantly reduces serious clotting events and prolongs circuit survival time compared to standard RCA or saline flushing in high-bleeding-risk hemodialysis patients.
Supports RCA-two preference in high-bleeding-risk hemodialysis; confirms benefits over standard RCA and saline.
ABSTRACT Background: Recommended regular saline flushing presents clinical ineffectiveness for hemodialysis (HD) patients at high risk of bleeding with heparin contraindication. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has previously been used with a Ca 2+ containing dialysate with prefiltered citrate in one arm (RCA-one). However, anticoagulation is not always achievable and up to 40% results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber. In this study, we have transferred one-quarter of the TSC from the prefiltered to the post filter based on RCA-one, which we have called RCA-two. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA-two with either saline flushing or RCA-one in HD patients with a high bleeding risk. Method : In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 52 HD patients (77 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-two and RCA-one group in part one of the trial, and 45 patients (64 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-two and saline group in part two of the trial. Serious clotting events, adverse events and blood analyses were recorded. Results :Serious clotting events in the RCA-two group were significantly lower compared with the RCA-one and saline group (7.89% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.011; 3.03% vs. 54.84%, P < 0.001, respectively). The median circuit survival time was 240 min (IQR 240 to 240) in the RCA-two group, was significantly longer than 230 min (IQR 155 to 240, P < 0.001) in the RCA-one group and 210 min (IQR 135 to 240,P = 0.003) in the saline group. The majority of the AEs were hypotension, hypoglycemia and chest tightness, most of which were mild in intensity. Eight patients (20.51%) in the RCA-one group, 4 patients (12.90%) in the saline group and 10 patients (26.31%) in the RCA-two group, P>0.05. Conclusions : Our data demonstrated that the modified anticoagulation protocol was more effective and feasible during hemodialysis therapy for patients at high risk of bleeding. Trial registration: GDREC, GDREC2017250H. Registered February 2, 2018; prospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: