Why the study?
Saline flushing is often clinically ineffective for HD patients at high bleeding risk, and standard regional citrate anticoagulation frequently results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber.
Does modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) reduce serious clotting events compared to RCA-one or saline flushing in hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding?
Does modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) reduce serious clotting events compared to RCA-one or saline flushing in hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding?
Modified regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA-two) significantly reduces serious clotting events and prolongs circuit survival time compared to standard RCA or saline flushing in hemodialysis patients at high bleeding risk.
Modified RCA-two reduces clotting events in high-bleeding-risk hemodialysis; extends RCT evidence for circuit patency versus standard approaches.
ABSTRACT Background: Recommended regular saline flushing presents clinical ineffectiveness for hemodialysis (HD) patients at high risk of bleeding with heparin contraindication. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has previously been used with a Ca 2+ containing dialysate with prefiltered citrate in one arm (RCA-one). However, anticoagulation is not always achievable and up to 40% results in serious clotting in the venous expansion chamber. In this study, we have transferred one-quarter of the TSC from the prefiltered to the post filter based on RCA-one, which we have called RCA-two. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of RCA-two with either saline flushing or RCA-one in HD patients with a high bleeding risk. Method : In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial, 52 HD patients (77 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-two and RCA-one group in part one of the trial, and 45 patients (64 sessions) were randomized to the RCA-two and saline group in part two of the trial. Serious clotting events, adverse events and blood analyses were recorded. Results :Serious clotting events in the RCA-two group were significantly lower compared with the RCA-one and saline group (7.89% vs. 30.77%, P = 0.011; 3.03% vs. 54.84%, P < 0.001, respectively). The median circuit survival time was 240 min (IQR 240 to 240) in the RCA-two group, was significantly longer than 230 min (IQR 155 to 240, P < 0.001) in the RCA-one group and 210 min (IQR 135 to 240,P = 0.003) in the saline group. The majority of the AEs were hypotension, hypoglycemia and chest tightness, most of which were mild in intensity. Eight patients (20.51%) in the RCA-one group, 4 patients (12.90%) in the saline group and 10 patients (26.31%) in the RCA-two group, P>0.05. Conclusions : Our data demonstrated that the modified anticoagulation protocol was more effective and feasible during hemodialysis therapy for patients at high risk of bleeding. Trial registration: GDREC, GDREC2017250H. Registered February 2, 2018; prospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: