Why the study?
What are the optimal periprocedural anticoagulation strategies to minimize thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
What are the optimal periprocedural anticoagulation strategies to minimize thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation?
Uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and appropriate heparin dosing are key strategies to minimize the 0.9-5% risk of periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding events during AF ablation.
Supports uninterrupted anticoagulation in AF ablation; leaves open optimal heparin dosing and LAA screening pending prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Catheter ablation for AF (CAAF) has emerged as an effective treatment option of rhythm control for patients with symptomatic AF. However, the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding in the periprocedural period represent a worrisome complication of this therapy. The reported incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding events associated with CAAF varies from 0.9% to 5% depending on the CAAF strategy and the anticoagulation regimen used in the periprocedural period. Areas covered: The different anticoagulation regimens used prior to, during, and after CAAF to minimize the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events are reviewed. The use of uninterrupted oral anticoagulation and appropriate heparin dosing to achieve safe activated clotting time levels are also detailed. A comprehensive approach with assessment of individual risk for thromboembolic and bleeding complications, and understanding the pharmacokinetics of the anticoagulant agents available is also reviewed. Expert opinion: The key advances done in the periprocedural anticoagulation field include the use of uninterrupted anticoagulation strategies in patients undergoing AF ablation and efforts to simplify the selection of patients who need LAA thrombus screening prior to ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Briceño et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: