Why the study?
Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of end-organ damage require regular, accurate BP measurement, but methods have evolved from mercury sphygmomanometers to various office and out-of-clinic techniques.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Comparison
Different BP recording methods, their advantages, disadvantages, and differences
Design
Comprehensive review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This comprehensive review highlights that while oscillometric devices have largely replaced mercury sphygmomanometers, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) remains the optimal method for accurate diagnosis and management of hypertension, particularly for detecting non-dipping and white coat hypertension.
Increased blood pressure (BP) damages multiple organs. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of end-organ require regular, accurate BP measurement. BP was predominantly recorded using the mercury-based-sphygmomanometer. Recently, oscillometric-based devices have been invented and are commonly used worldwide. BP measurement methods are broadly divided into Office-based and out-of-clinic (home). The patient at home or workplace conducts home BP measurement, either intermittently (Non-ambulatory BP monitoring [NABPM]) or continuously (Ambulatory BP Monitoring [ABPM]). Despite the variety of BP measurement methods, the ABPM method is the best method of BP recording, especially in unstable (liable) BP readings. NABPM is conducted less frequently in the nighttime, whereas ABPM is conducted day and night and gives more frequent stable BP records. In ABPM, the mean of the measurements is automatically calculated and stored for later use or sent directly to the physician. Furthermore, some people may have an increase in BP at nighttime or loss of the dipping BP character, which increases the risks of high BP complications. Hence, in this comprehensive review, we will discuss the different methods of BP recording, their advantages and disadvantage, and their differences. Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were searched for the related reviews and original articles cited for BP measurement methods and techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habas et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: