Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over the past few decades the recommendations of many therapeutic enthusiasts have remained the same — namely, to prevent hypokalemia in diuretic-treated hypertensive patients by administering either potassium supplements or potassium-sparing agents. The putative rationale for this approach, however, has changed dramatically. Treatment was recommended initially simply because potassium deficiency was considered unhealthy, later because it might induce carbohydrate intolerance and hypercholesterolemia, and a few years ago because it might produce malignant arrhythmias in hypertensive patients, particularly those who sustained an acute myocardial infarction.1 Though cogent arguments have been adduced against these concerns,2 , 3 and though serious questions have been raised . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassirer et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: