Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This study evaluates global radar‐derived digital elevation models (DEMs), namely the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), NASADEM and GLO‐30 DEMs. We evaluate their accuracy over bare‐earth terrain and characterize elevation biases induced by forests using global Lidar measurements from the Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat)'s Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS), the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) and the ICESat‐2 Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) instruments collected on locally flat terrain. Our analysis is based on error statistics calculated for each DEM tile, which are then summarized as global error percentiles, providing a regional characterization of DEM quality. We find NASADEM to be a significant improvement upon the SRTM V3. Over bare ground areas, the mean elevation bias and root mean square error (RMSE) improved from 0.68 to 2.50 m respectively to 0.00 and 1.5 m as compared to ICESat/GLAS. GLO‐30 is more accurate with bare ground elevation bias and RMSE were below 0.05 and 0.55 m. Similar improvements were observed when compared to GEDI and ICESat‐2 measurements. The DEM biases associated with the presence of vegetation vary linearly with canopy height, and more closely follow the percentile of Lidar Relative Height (RH50). Other factors such as canopy density, radar frequency and Lidar technology also contribute to observed elevation biases. This global analysis highlights the potential of various technologies for mapping of Earth's topography, and the need for more advanced remote sensing observations that can resolve vegetation structure and sub‐canopy ground elevation.
Simard et al. (Tue,) studied this question.