Key result
A machine-learning model utilizing statewide health information exchange data predicted one-year risk of incident heart failure with a c-statistic of 0.824.
Why the study?
New-onset HF carries a poor prognosis, but no health information exchange-based clinical decision support tools existed to identify incident-HF risk.
Can a machine-learning model utilizing statewide health information exchange data accurately predict the one-year risk of incident heart failure in adults aged ≥ 40 years?
Observational (n=521,347)
Yes
Can a machine-learning model utilizing statewide health information exchange data accurately predict the one-year risk of incident heart failure in adults aged ≥ 40 years?
Effect estimate: c-statistic 0.824
A machine-learning model using passively collected statewide health information exchange data can accurately predict the one-year risk of incident heart failure, potentially allowing for targeted resource allocation.
Supports targeted HF prevention if validated; leaves open whether deployment improves outcomes in practice.
Background New-onset heart failure (HF) is associated with poor prognosis and high healthcare utilization. Early identification of patients at increased risk incident-HF may allow for focused allocation of preventative care resources. Health information exchange (HIE) data span the entire spectrum of clinical care, but there are no HIE-based clinical decision support tools for diagnosis of incident-HF. We applied machine-learning methods to model the one-year risk of incident-HF from the Maine statewide-HIE. Methods and results We included subjects aged ≥ 40 years without prior HF ICD9/10 codes during a three-year period from 2015 to 2018, and incident-HF defined as assignment of two outpatient or one inpatient code in a year. A tree-boosting algorithm was used to model the probability of incident-HF in year two from data collected in year one, and then validated in year three. 5,668 of 521,347 patients (1.09%) developed incident-HF in the validation cohort. In the validation cohort, the model c-statistic was 0.824 and at a clinically predetermined risk threshold, 10% of patients identified by the model developed incident-HF and 29% of all incident-HF cases in the state of Maine were identified. Conclusions Utilizing machine learning modeling techniques on passively collected clinical HIE data, we developed and validated an incident-HF prediction tool that performs on par with other models that require proactively collected clinical data. Our algorithm could be integrated into other HIEs to leverage the EMR resources to provide individuals, systems, and payors with a risk stratification tool to allow for targeted resource allocation to reduce incident-HF disease burden on individuals and health care systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duong et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Incident heart failure (n=521,347). Machine-learning risk prediction model (tree-boosting algorithm) was evaluated on Incident heart failure (two outpatient or one inpatient code in a year) (c-statistic 0.824). A machine-learning model utilizing statewide health information exchange data predicted one-year risk of incident heart failure with a c-statistic of 0.824.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: