Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The criticism of my of intelligence by Humphreys and Dachler (1969), although making an interesting and worthwhile methodological point, is based on so limited a view of the theory and of the supporting evidence as to constitute a very weak criticism when viewed in proper perspective. The questionable suitability of the Project TALENT tests used by Humphreys and Dachler for testing hypotheses derived from the theory, as compared with tests and studies specifically designed for this purpose, hardly warrants these authors' overly sweeping conclusion that ... Jensen's published results can be disregarded and that unbiased data lend no support to his theory [p. 426].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arthur R. Jensen (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: