Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates prehospital thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, suggesting improved outcomes.
PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prehospital thrombolysis was performed on 93 patients during a time period of 6 years (3/1992 to 9/1998) in an urban area. Thrombolysis with rt-PA (20 mg rt-PA bolus, 30 minute infusion with 30 mg rt-PA) could be started within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms in 67 patients (73.6%). RESULTS: The time gain from prehospital thrombolysis amounted to 38 +/- 14 minutes. Bleeding complications were not observed in the prehospital setting, but 2 patients suffered from intracerebral hemorrhage subsequently and died in the hospital. An aborted infarction (CKmax < 200 U/l and no new Q-waves) was observed in 18 patients (20%) and another 23 patients (25%) had a limitation of infarct size (CKmax < 500 U/l or no new Q-waves) despite obvious signs of myocardial ischemia in the first ECG. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates a considerable time gain for prehospital thrombolysis even for an urban area. Accelerated rt-PA is a safe and comfortable thrombolysis regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kasper et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: