Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines work autonomy and goods distribution in low-skilled and high-skilled labor, suggesting implications for workplace democracy.
Political theorists have been framing the problems of unfreedom and domination at work as inconsistent with the requirements of political democracy, undermining the democratic potential of the workplace and inducing psychological and status harm. Although these are important insights, political theorists are often unwilling to frame the hierarchical workplace as an issue of distributive justice. This paper, by bringing in the empirical literature on work autonomy, offers a framework to explicate the relationship between freedom at work and the distribution of essential goods at paid work. Through such framework, the paper argues that procedural and substantive freedom at work are essential to the fair distribution of the goods of work. By examining the empirical literature, the paper further argues that there exists a polarization of the goods of work between high-skilled and low-skilled labor, and the polarization offers a pro-tanto justification of workplace democracy for the least advantaged workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chi Kwok (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: