Key result
Peak velocity of circumferential fiber shortening was significantly higher in patients with normal compared to abnormal left ventricular function (2.54 vs 1.09 circ/sec, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Can a three-dimensional construct of left ventricular circumferential velocity, tension, and length during ejection differentiate normal from abnormal LV function?
Observational (n=17)
Can a three-dimensional construct of left ventricular circumferential velocity, tension, and length during ejection differentiate normal from abnormal LV function?
A three-dimensional construct of LV circumferential velocity, tension, and length obtained during cardiac catheterization can accurately differentiate normal from abnormal myocardial function.
May support LV function assessment via circumferential shortening velocity during catheterization; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
A three-dimensional construct of the tension-velocity-length relations of the intact human heart has been obtained in 17 patients by measurement of instantaneous ascending aortic flow velocity, left ventricular (LV) high-fidelity pressure, and end-diastolic volume. Left ventricular instantaneous volume was determined by subtracting the integral of the flow trace, obtained with an electromagnetic velocity catheter, at each 5-sec interval from the end-diastolic volume measured on a biplane left ventriculogram. By utilizing a thin-walled spherical model for the LV, instantaneous velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (V CF ), wall tension, and circumferential length were calculated and plotted with the aid of a computer on a three-dimensional perspective graph. The resulting tension-velocity-length relations in seven patients with normal LV function were clearly separated from those of 10 patients with abnormal LV function. Of velocity indices alone, peak V CF in circumferences/sec (circ/sec) provided the best statistical separation between the groups with normal and abnormal ventricular function (2.54 ± 0.18 [ sem ] circ/sec and 1.09 ± 0.15 circ/sec, respectively) ( P < 0.001). The time to peak V CF averaged 194 ± 13.2 msec and 167 ± 9.3 msec in the patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function, respectively ( P > 0.05). Likewise, V CF at peak tension was significantly greater in the patients with normal as opposed to abnormal LV function (1.77 ± 0.10 and 0.93 ± 0.15 circ/sec, respectively) ( P < 0.001). Time to peak tension was 138 ± 14.8 msec and 182 ± 17.1 msec in the normal and abnormal patients, respectively ( P > 0.05). Mean V CF also served to separate the two groups, averaging 1.35 ± 0.07 and 0.72 ± 0.10 circ/sec in the patients with normal and abnormal ventricular performance, respectively ( P < 0.001). Peak wall tension did not differ significantly between the two patient groups, averaging 231.4 ± 15.7 and 273.3 ± 16.4 g/cm in the patients with normal and abnormal ventricular function, respectively. Peak instantaneous power was higher in the normal compared to the abnormal group, averaging 8.39 ± 0.83 and 5.91 ± 0.60 kg-cm/sec per cm of circumference, respectively ( P < 0.05). It is concluded that a three-dimensional construct of left ventricular circumferential velocity, tension, and length during ejection is readily obtainable during diagnostic cardiac catheterization and provides a sensitive and comprehensive description of LV myocardial function in man.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peterson et al. (1973) conducted an observational in Normal vs abnormal left ventricular function (n=17). Normal left ventricular function vs. Abnormal left ventricular function was evaluated on Peak velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (V CF) in circumferences/sec (p=<0.001). Peak velocity of circumferential fiber shortening was significantly higher in patients with normal compared to abnormal left ventricular function (2.54 vs 1.09 circ/sec, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: