Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MFCC (Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients) and PLP (Perceptual linear prediction coefficients) or RASTA-PLP have demonstrated good results whether when they are used in combination with prosodic features as suprasegmental (long-term) information or when used stand-alone as segmental (short-time) information. MFCC and PLP feature parameterization aims to represent the speech parameters in a way similar to how sound is perceived by humans. However, MFCC and PLP are usually computed from a Hamming-windowed periodogram spectrum estimate that is characterized by large variance. In this paper we study the effect of averaging spectral estimates obtained using a set of orthogonal tapers (windows) on emotion recognition performance. The multitaper MFCC and PLP are examined separately as short-time information vectors modeled using Gaussian mixture models (GMMs). When tested on the FAU AIBO spontaneous emotion corpus, a relative improvement ranging from 2.2% to 3.9% for both MFCC and PLP systems is achieved by multiple windowed spectral features compared to single windowed ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attabi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: