Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article criticises current conceptual frameworks focused on the evaluation of the performance of electoral systems. It offers a new tool allowing researchers to measure the size of the deviation of electoral outcomes from theoretical expectations. The index d=log[ N S /( MS ) 1/6 ] is built on the Seat Product (Taagepera, Rein (2007b) Predicting Party Sizes: The Logic of Simple Electoral Systems . New York: Oxford University Press) and captures the deviations of electoral outcomes from predictions solely on the basis of two institutional factors – average district magnitude ( M ) and size of assembly ( S ). The theoretical background of index d is explained, and its reliability is further supported by conventional econometric methods based on empirical data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nemčok et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: