Key result
Off-label reduced-dose apixaban did not reduce major bleeding (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.69-2.09) or thromboembolic events (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.71-2.34) compared to adequate-dose apixaban in Taiwanese patients.
Why the study?
Little is known about the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of off-label reduced-dose apixaban in East Asians with nonvalvular AF, who are reportedly at high risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding.
Does off-label reduced-dose apixaban reduce hemorrhagic risk or improve effectiveness compared to per-label adequate-dose apixaban in Taiwanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,073)
Yes
Does off-label reduced-dose apixaban reduce hemorrhagic risk or improve effectiveness compared to per-label adequate-dose apixaban in Taiwanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 1.2 (95% CI 0.69–2.09)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.8% vs 3.8%
Off-label reduced-dose apixaban does not reduce major bleeding risk and may nonsignificantly increase thromboembolic events compared to standard per-label dosing in East Asian patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Off-label reduced-dose apixaban should not yet change practice in East Asian AF; leaves open optimal dosing for randomized confirmation.
East Asians are reportedly at high risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding; therefore, some physicians prefer to prescribe low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Little is known about the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of off-label reduced-dose apixaban in East Asians with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of off-label reduced-dose apixaban in Taiwanese patients with nonvalvular AF.This retrospective cohort study enrolled 1073 patients with nonvalvular AF who took apixaban between July 2014 and October 2018 from 4 medical centers in southern Taiwan. The primary outcomes included thromboembolic events (stroke/transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism), major bleeding, and all-cause mortality.Among all patients, 826 (77%) patients were classified as the "per-label adequate-dose" treatment group (i.e., consistent with the Food and Drug Administration label recommendations) while 247 (23%) patients were the "off-label reduced-dose" treatment group. The mean follow-up period was 17.5 ± 13 months. The "off-label reduced-dose" group did not have a lower major bleeding rate than the "per-label adequate-dose" group (4.8% vs 3.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-2.09), but had a nonsignificantly higher incidence of thromboembolic events (4.23% vs 3.05%, adjusted HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.71-2.34).An off-label reduced-dose apixaban treatment strategy may not provide incremental benefits or safety for Taiwanese patients with nonvalvular AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=1,073). Off-label reduced-dose apixaban vs. Per-label adequate-dose apixaban was evaluated on major bleeding (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.69-2.09). Off-label reduced-dose apixaban did not reduce major bleeding (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.69-2.09) or thromboembolic events (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.71-2.34) compared to adequate-dose apixaban in Taiwanese patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: