Why the study?
Does segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping accurately quantify aortic blood flow compared to non-segmented PVM in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping accurately quantify aortic blood flow compared to non-segmented PVM in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Segmented k-space PVM (especially seg-9) provides accurate and fast quantification of aortic blood flow compared to non-segmented techniques.
Supports segmented PVM for efficient aortic flow quantification in CVD; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) in quantifying aortic blood flow from through-plane velocity measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two segmented PVM schemes were evaluated, one with seven lines per segment (seg-7) and one with nine lines per segment (seg-9), in twenty patients with cardiovascular disease. A non-segmented (non-seg) PVM acquisition was also performed to provide the reference data. RESULTS: There was agreement between the aortic flow curves acquired with segmented and non-segmented PVM. The calculated systolic and total flow volume per cycle from the seg-7 and the seg-9 scans correlated and agreed with the flow volumes from the non-seg scans (differences < 5%). Sign tests showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P-values > 0.05) between the segmented and the non-segmented PVM measurements [corrected]. Seg-9, which was the fastest among the three sequences, provided adequate spatial and temporal resolution (> 10 phases per cycle). CONCLUSION: Segmented k-space PVM shows great clinical potential in blood flow quantification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatzimavroudis et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: