Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reveals how gotong royong shaped social citizenship in Indonesia, highlighting its transformation and implications.
This article examines gotong royong as social citizenship in the second half of the twentieth century in Indonesia. Gotong royong was traditionally understood as a collective spirit among neighbours to strengthen economic and social resilience. However, the institutionalisation of the system through massive development programmes since the 1940s has influenced the common people's perception and practice of it. This article argues that the co-option of gotong royong as part of the discourse of nation-state building transformed the popular view of labour and capital mobilisation from an openly critical stance to apparent submission. Gotong royong became a means of social engineering and an ingenious linguistic strategy by which state elites orchestrated control over the making of citizens. Still, Indonesians have remained vigilant of their participation in gotong royong , and about the potential for its misuse by corrupt officials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agus Suwignyo (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: