Why the study?
Does molar sodium lactate solution improve recovery of the heart compared to electrical stimulation in patients with cardiac arrest?
Does molar sodium lactate solution improve recovery of the heart compared to electrical stimulation in patients with cardiac arrest?
Molar sodium lactate is discussed as a potential alternative or adjunct to electrical stimulation and sympathomimetic drugs for arousing spontaneous ventricular contractions in cardiac arrest.
May warrant investigation as adjunct in cardiac arrest; leaves open comparative efficacy versus electrical stimulation in prospective trials.
External electrical stimulation by an artificial cardiac pacemaker can be lifesaving when used to stimulate the heart in ventricular standstill. Additional clinical evidence¹after Zoll's first report in 1952²of its successful application has established beyond question the usefulness and efficacy of this mode of therapy. Once applied, electrical stimulation of the ventricles must be continued indefinitely, until the heart has regained the ability to beat rhythmically without the help of an artifical stimulus. The period of time for which electrical stimulation will be required cannot be predicted. To accelerate the recovery of the heart, epinephrine, arterenol (nor-epinephrine), isoproterenol (Isuprel) hydrochloride, ephedrine, and other drugs have been used frequently for the purpose of arousing spontaneous ventricular contractions. These sympathomimetic drugs are not always dependable and indeed may produce multifocal ventricular activity,³resulting in ventricular fibrillation.⁴Recently molar sodium lactate solution has also been shown to have
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leonard M. Silverman (1957) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: